logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2019.10.01 2019고단332
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On June 25, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for one-year imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daejeon District Court's Support for Mountainous Districts.

7.3. The judgment became final and conclusive.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendant is a space between the victim B (n, 47 years of age) and the Defendant’s knowledge through hosting.

Around 22:50 on May 4, 2019, the Defendant committed assault by means of drinking alcohol, cutting the victim’s trees, etc. on the ground that the Defendant no mobile phone existed before D located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si.

2. The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was driving away the Defendant’s body string a car and driving away from the patrol vehicle under the influence of alcohol, on the grounds that the police officer F, who was a police officer belonging to the Hasasan Police Station E box, sent out after receiving the report of B 112 on the date and time stipulated in the above paragraph (1).

The police officers called up for this reason saw the patrol vehicle in the vicinity of the galleg in the galleg in the area of the galleg in the galleg in the galleg in the galleg in the galleg in the galleg in the galleg in the galleg in the galleg in the galleg in the galleg in the Chungcheongnamsan-

However, the defendant refused to take a bath for the police officer to take a drinking test at least three times, and the police officer F, who was a police officer dispatched to the scene, was assaulted by the defendant in such a way as to injure the chest of the above police officer by hand in order to take a drinking test.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate performance of their duties, such as a request for a drinking test for a drinking driver.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. B written statements;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and application of statutes governing judgment;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Article 37 of the Criminal Code for the Handling of Concurrent Crimes

arrow