logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.09.18 2018고단1014
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-Scar.

On November 23, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 19:30, and proceeds from the road 274, which is located in the 274-ro, the upper part of the Ansan City, Seosan-si, by using the same as the one-lane from the new high-priced side to the opposite highest distance, and changed the course to the left-hand left-hand turn in order to make a U-turn.

Since there is a mark of restriction on career change in the white-ray, a person engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to refrain from changing course.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the damage to the right-hand left-hand turn due to the negligence of breaking the white-down turn and changing the way to the left-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-on vehicle operated by the victim D, the front part of the EKaman car driving by the defendant's driver's car.

Defendant 1 caused the victim D’s catum cats, etc. requiring the treatment for up to two weeks due to the above occupational negligence; Defendant 1 suffered the victim F, who was on board the said car, a catum catum catum, etc. requiring treatment for up to three weeks; and Defendant G suffered the same victim’s catum catum, etc. requiring treatment for up to three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statements made by witnesses D and G in the fifth public trial records;

1. A report on traffic accidents and a survey report on actual condition;

1. Each medical certificate (the defendant was not involved in an accident to the extent that the victims sustained an injury);

The argument is asserted.

In the case of a traffic accident analysis report through DNA, there is a limit to the probative value by failing to reflect the specific circumstances at the time of the accident and the personal characteristics of the victims. Taking into account the details and details of the accident in this case, the injury of the victims and the degree and circumstances after the accident, it can be acknowledged that the victims suffered from the injury requiring medical treatment, unlike the above appraisal report.

Application of Statutes

1..

arrow