beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.
Defendant
A above.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Any person who intends to install discharge facilities of Defendant A wastewater shall obtain permission or report to the competent authorities under the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;
Nevertheless, from October 2015 to April 27, 2016, the Defendant installed and operated a facility with at least 0.1 cubic meters of the maximum volume of wastewater per day by installing and operating CNC Line 21 and machine learning center one machine and machine learning center one machine, the total volume of wastewater per day of which is at least 0.4 cubic meters, which is at least 0.1 cubic meters, and is at least 0.1 cubic meters of the facility where wastewater does not flow out to the outside of the machine or facility in circulation, as a manufacturing facility for metal products, which are wastewater discharge facilities, without reporting to the competent authorities at the place of business where the steel products located in C, building materials, and related parts are manufactured and operated.
2. From March 4, 2016, Defendant B, a public prosecutor, was indicted on the same date as that of the original crime 1, but according to the records of this case, Defendant B, a corporation incorporated on March 4, 2016, and thus, Defendant B is liable for both punishment against Defendant A’s violation from the date of establishment.
Therefore, this court's arbitrary reduction of criminal facts as stated in its reasoning, and it seems that it does not cause a great obstacle to Defendant B's exercise of defense right.
From April 27, 2016 to April 27, 2016, A, the representative director of the defendant, committed the same act as the description in the preceding paragraph with respect to the defendant's business.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. A statement of detection of D;
1. Application of a report on detection and on-site photographing statutes;
1. Defendant A: Article 76 subparag. 2 of the Water Quality and A of the Act on the Conservation of Water Quality and A’s Thirousness; Article 33(1) of the Act on the Conservation of Water Quality and A’s Living ; Articles 81, 76 subparag. 2 and 33(1) of the Water Quality and A of the Act on the Conservation of Water Quality and Living ;
1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1.