logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2013. 11. 08. 선고 2012누35766 판결
8년 이상 농지를 자경한 것으로 인정하기 어려움 [국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon District Court 2012Guhap943 ( November 02, 2012)

Case Number of the previous trial

Board of Audit and Inspection ( October 25, 201)

Title

It is difficult to recognize that farmland has been self-sufficient for not less than eight years;

Summary

It is difficult to recognize that farmland has been cultivated directly for at least eight years in light of the fact that there was business income during the period of farmland possession, that there was no objective data on the yield or sales of crops corresponding to the farmland ownership, and that the receipt, etc. submitted has been made about the transaction before farmland inheritance, etc.

Related statutes

Article 69 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act

Cases

2012Nu35766 Ascertainment of revocation of request for rectification

Plaintiff and appellant

IsaA

Defendant, Appellant

port of origin

Judgment of the first instance court

Suwon District Court Decision 2012Guhap943 Decided November 2, 2012

Conclusion of Pleadings

September 27, 2013

Imposition of Judgment

November 8, 2013

Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's rejection disposition against the plaintiff on January 12, 201 against the plaintiff shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasons for this decision are as follows: (a) entry of evidence Nos. 17 and 23-1 through 3 of "No. 23-23 of "No. 3 of "No. 18" in the judgment of the court of first instance, and the testimony of ParkB by the witness of the court of first instance is modified to "No. 23 and 27 of "No. 3 of "No. 18" (including the provisional number)",

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the conclusion of the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow