1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 25, 2010, while working as an employee belonging to the agency, the Plaintiff was faced with the board stone and roof stone, which were cited in excess of the pipe stone from the place of work on January 25, 2010 (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. The plaintiff suffered from injury to the right 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 201 2 3 201 20 201 201

7. Up to 31. 31. Medical treatment received in B hospital, etc.

C. (1) On February 6, 2012, if the Plaintiff discovered the Defendant’s “abdemband vertebrate 2” resulting from the instant accident, then filed an application for approval of additional injury and additional medical care, but the Defendant rejected the application on April 4, 2012.

(2) The Plaintiff dissatisfied with this and filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking revocation of the disposition of non-approval of additional medical care by this court 2012Guhap523, and this court rendered a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff on May 21, 2013 on the part of the Plaintiff’s revocation of the part of the disposition of this court No. 20149, Apr. 4, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

On June 28, 2013, the Defendant approved the pressure frame No. 2 as an additional injury and disease.

(hereinafter “instant additional injury and disease”). D.

(1) On July 10, 2013, the Plaintiff filed each of the medical care benefits with the Defendant, “from August 1, 2010 to February 6, 2012,” and “from August 8, 2011 to March 9, 2014,” in relation to the instant additional medical care benefits.”

On September 10, 2013, the Defendant: (a) recognized the period of medical care from August 1, 2010 to January 31, 201, which is the date following the end of the existing period of medical care; and (b) decided to pay temporary layoff benefits from August 1, 2010 to October 20, 201, which is the day before the Plaintiff start work again.

(2) As to this, the Plaintiff against the Defendant, as the court 2013Guhap513, revocation of the additional approval for change of an illness and the partial payment of temporary layoff benefits.