A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] The defendant is the representative director of the Dispute Resolution Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "B"), and he became aware of D, an attorney-at-law, who is the legal representative of the C Bank in the civil litigation process between B and C Bank.

On August 30, 2012, the Defendant requested C Bank to issue a seizure and collection order against C Bank on August 30, 2012, and received the attachment and collection order on August 30, 2012. Attorneys D, the legal representative of C Bank, received (receiving number E) a “application for suspension of compulsory execution” to the Seoul Central District Court on September 5, 2012, and prepared and submitted (receiving number G) a letter of delegation for a lawsuit on which a transit certificate (No. G) is attached, and at around 14:30 on the same day, “application for cancellation of the seizure and collection order” was received (receiving number I) with the same court.

The Defendant only submitted F’s certificate (No. G) to the Seoul Central District Court at around 09:30 on the same day after he obtained a certificate in the F’s name as to the above case, and submitted it to the Seoul Central District Court at around 09:30 on the same day, and did not reuse the above transit certificate with a knife and used it. However, the Defendant had the intention to file a complaint with D with the attorney by forging a private document

【Criminal Facts】

Around November 20, 2017, the Defendant forged the F’s certificate of cancellation of compulsory execution to the same court (receiving number I) at around 14:30 of the same day, which is a private document related to the certification that he/she had passed the F through the F by copying the F’s certificate (no.G) in the F’s name submitted with D’s application for suspension of compulsory execution (receiving number E) to the Seoul Central District Court on September 5, 2012, around 09:30, the Defendant, at around 14:30 of the same day, forged the F’s certificate of cancellation of compulsory execution (receiving number I) with the aforesaid official in charge of the above court, who was unaware of the fact, used the F’s certificate (no.G.) in the manner of submitting a separate document of delegation with a separate document of delegation.