logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원통영지원 2015.08.11 2015가단3104
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

가. 별지 목록 기재 부동산 중 별지 건축물 현황도 표시 ㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣,...

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

가. C은 2012. 5. 16. D으로부터 별지 목록 기재 부동산 중 별지 건축물 현황도 표시 ㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣, ㉠의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈎ 부분 제401호 40㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 건물’이라 한다)을 임대차보증금 200만 원, 월 임료 50만 원, 임대차기간 2012. 5. 16.부터 2013. 5. 15.까지로 정하여 임차하였고(이하 위 임대차계약을 ‘이 사건 임대차계약’이라 한다), 피고는 C의 동거인으로서 위 건물에 입주하였다.

B. C temporarily resided in the instant building on May 16, 2012, and directors. The Defendant agreed with D to maintain the lease relationship with the lessee of the instant lease agreement as the Defendant. The said lease agreement was implicitly renewed at the expiration of the period.

C. D sells real estate listed in the separate sheet to E on February 20, 2014, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on February 21, 2014, and E sells the said real estate to the Plaintiff on August 7, 2014, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on August 29, 2014.

The Defendant did not pay the rent from September 1, 2014. On March 3, 2015, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a document evidencing that the lease contract is terminated on the grounds of the payment of rent at least two occasions, and the above content-certified mail reached the Defendant around that time.

E. The instant lease agreement terminated due to the Defendant’s failure to pay two or more installments of the period, and the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant building to the Plaintiff, and the Defendant is obligated to pay rent or unjust enrichment calculated at the rate of KRW 500,000 per month from September 1, 2014 to the completion of delivery of the instant building.

2. Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Judgment by public notice) of the applicable provisions of Acts;

arrow