(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.03.12 2017고정327

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.03.12 2017고정327

건조물침입등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Before February 28, 2017, the Defendant transferred the ownership of the building to another person while being in charge of the real estate leasing business at the second floor office of the D Building, which led to the transfer of the ownership of the building to another person.

On May 4, 2017, in front of the D Building at 17:00 a.m., the Defendant forced by force the static door of the building fixed for the purpose of bringing his or her goods from the 2nd floor of the building in front of the previous building, and intruded into the building without permission from the victim E to the sales office managed by the victim E.

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Reporting on occurrence of a disaster;

1. Investigation report (to be accompanied by a registration certificate and quotation submitted by the victim E);

1. In the investigation report (the hearing of statements about the intent of agreement of the victim, etc.) (the defendant and his defense counsel did not manage the building of this case, the defendant actually occupied the building of this case, and the defendant possessed the building in order to take out the article owned by the defendant, and therefore do not go against the will of the manager

In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the Defendant may be found guilty of the facts charged in this case that the Defendant infringed on a building contrary to the intention of the manager E.

① On February 28, 2017, the instant building was registered in the in-house director G and E in the in-house director G and E, etc. Around that time, the Defendant knew that the ownership of the instant building was transferred, was no longer used as an office, and was prepared for civil litigation and criminal appeal against the F and G, etc.

(2) On March 2017, the Defendant entered the instant building and tried to bring about a new house, etc., but the key is changed.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2018.05.10 2018고단1181

-서울북부지방법원 2017.10.13 2017고단1622

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.04.24 2017가단210978

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2021.02.03 2019고단3065

-수원지방법원 2018.02.22 2015고단2717 (1)