logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2021.02.03 2019고단3065
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 25, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a crime of fraud in the Daejeon District Court's Incheon District Court's Branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 2, 2017.

【The instant premise fact-finding 【The Defendant, on February 16, 2017, obtained a loan of approximately KRW 2.6 billion from the D shop, which is a one-story of the victim C’s curios located in the first floor of the building B, which was located in the Sejong-si, Sejong-si, and was making a loan of KRW 2.6 billion as security, and paid KRW 2.6 billion to the Defendant who received a loan from the appraiser as security and repaid the existing loan of KRW 60 billion and paid KRW 2 billion as the purchase price.

The assertion that there is no doubt that this part is merely a premise fact, but is not included in the facts charged in the instant case, and therefore the decision on this is not stated separately (C and N did not say that they purchase B commercial buildings from the Defendant).

A) First, the sales of E building units at a discount of 30% (1,198,540,350 won) of the sales price (1,712,20,500 won in total) are different from the 1st floor Fhos, 1st floor Ghos, 2nd floor Hhos, and 3rd floor Is (hereinafter “E building commercial buildings”) under the ground of the E building. If the sales price of E building units is located, the sales price was proposed to take out loans as security and pay the sales price by 30% discount of the victim and E building commercial buildings.

During that process, the defendant had a victim believe that he/she would return money safely and had the victim believe that he/she would return money safely on March 3, 2017, while allowing the victim to deposit KRW 350 million in the account under the name of the court in the operation of the defendant, around February 28, 2017. On March 3, 2017, the defendant had the victim deposit money KRW 250 million in the account under the name of the defendant in the name of the court in the name of the defendant.

arrow