logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.05 2015고정269
근로기준법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of the company D in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon who runs the landscape construction business using three regular workers.

From February 11, 2012 to June 4, 2014, the Defendant did not pay the total of KRW 1,287,610 on May 201, 2014, and KRW 1,500,870 on June 213, 2014 within 14 days from the date of retirement without agreement on the extension of the due date between the parties. From February 4, 2012 to April 4, 2014, the Defendant did not pay KRW 600,000 on February 20, 2014, the total of KRW 2,400,000 on February 3, 2014, and KRW 2,400 on the extension of the due date between the parties concerned, within 14 days from the date of retirement without agreement on the extension of the due date.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to E and F;

1. Relevant Articles of the Labor Standards Act and Articles 109 (1) and 36 of the same Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the facts charged is the representative of D Co., Ltd. in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, who runs a landscape construction business with three regular workers.

From April 1, 2013 to May 31, 2014, the Defendant did not pay KRW 2,124,160 as wages for March 2014, and KRW 2,124,160 as wages for April 1, 2014, and KRW 6,372,480 as wages for May 2014, within 14 days from the date of retirement without agreement between the parties to the extension of the due date.

2. Grounds for dismissing the public prosecution; and

(a) Crimes of non-compliance with will (Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act);

B. Expression of intention not to punish workers B after the indictment of this case

C. The defendant's reasons for sentencing (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act) of dismissal of prosecution is 2,300,000 won for workers F.

arrow