A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

147,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person working as the vice-director of the two primary industries D Team, E is a company G representative director located in the Gyeongsan-si, the Ha is a vice-president of G, and I is a G business director, and the J is a business director of L company located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungwon-si, Changwon-si.

1. On July 2012, the Defendant: (a) received the direction of the said E and H from the N restaurant located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si; and (b) received the direction of the said E and H on February 2013, the Defendant: (c) received the direction of the said E and H in return for the supply of less than the supply quantity initially contracted through the design modification; (d) received the contract amount as it is; (c) received KRW 24.5 million, along with the solicitation that “The convenience related to the provision of bid information and the design modification is continuously changed; and (d) received KRW 34.5 million in the same manner at the O restaurant located in the Hawon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si; and (e) received the property of KRW 30 million in the same manner in the same manner and received the property of KRW 8,900,000 in total in return for the performance of his/her duties at the early 2013.

2. Around March 201 to 4, 201, the Defendant received KRW 40 million,00,000,000 from L to L Company, along with a solicitation from J to “the Harebon project performed by the Hsina Industries to provide various information on projects, cooperation for approval on manufacturing drawings, etc. in connection with the Hsina project works performed by the Hsina Industries, and cooperation for approval on manufacturing drawings,” and around February 2 through 3, 2011, the Defendant received KRW 5 million, along with a solicitation to the same effect in relation to the “Daubon project performed by the Cireon project performed by the two Industries.” around March 4, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 10,000,000,000 in relation to the same solicitation to the same effect as “Maipur project performed by the two Industries,” and received KRW 301,000,000 in relation to the construction works performed by the two industrial complexes around December 2013.