beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for six months, for eight months, for each of the defendants B, and for ten months, for each of the defendants C.
(b).
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
F(State) is an enterprise producing industrial boiler, heat exchangeers, and heating paths, etc. in Jinwon-si, Gyeongwon-si, Gyeongwon-si, Gyeongnam-si, and Defendant A is the regular business of F (State), Defendant B is the former business of F (State) and Defendant C is the former business of F (State).
1. Defendant A
A. On October 8, 2012, Defendant A, in breach of occupational duty, prepared documents in accordance with the actual supply of the documents at the above F (State office) office and claimed expenses for the company, in violation of his duty, Defendant A demanded that “I, the partner company of the victim F (State), pay the price for the supply of the project-related goods to the HGSOC company in the order of supply to the H company, thereby returning the price. I would return the price.” The document was falsely prepared as if the F (State) ordered an additional order equivalent to KRW 50 million to the H company with the consent, and had the H company pay an excessive amount of KRW 50,000,000,000 to the H company, thereby obtaining economic benefits from the H company and causing damage equivalent to the same amount to the F (State).
B. On January 25, 2010, Defendant A received KRW 5 million from K, L, M, N, etc. totaling eight times from K, M, etc., as shown in the separate crime list (1), from around that time to October 24, 2013, as well as receiving KRW 29.45 million from K, L, M, N, etc., in addition to the unlawful solicitation, such as provision of supply-related convenience and continuous transactional maintenance, etc.
2. Around February 10, 2010, Defendant B received KRW 2,00,000,000 from the managing director of HH company M, a cooperation company of F (State) at the above F (State), as well as receiving KRW 56,50,000 from M, I,O, L, etc. on a total of 19 occasions from August 6, 2012, as indicated in the separate crime list (2).
3. Defendant C’s breach of trust.