Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall exchange, arrange for exchange or re-purchase of tangible and intangible results obtained through game water, and no one shall distribute or use game water of a content different from the rating classified by the game water committee.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, from July 15, 2015 to August 7, 2015, installed 40 units of the “NEWDDDD game” game, which was modified to enable the initialization of a separate total score from the game water committee, and offered money exchange to unspecified customers.

Thus, Defendant A is in charge of the overall operation of the above entertainment room, Defendant B is an employee, and Defendant B calculated the scores obtained through the 'NEW DIDD' game installed in the above entertainment room to many and unspecified customers as one won per point, and offered 10% of the amount corresponding to the scores as commission and exchanged.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide game water different from the rated game water, and exchanged the results obtained through the use of the game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A police seizure protocol (voluntary submission), and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as reports on internal accidents (on-site situations, etc.), response results of enforcement support, field photographs, etc.;

1. The Defendants: Article 45 subparag. 4 and Article 32 subparag. 2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of providing game water that differs from the classification of rating); Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)7 of the Criminal Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; and each choice of imprisonment;

1. Defendants who aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act.