logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.05.19 2017고단788
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 27, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the business of around 19:00 on March 27, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance for about one hour, including: (a) the Defendant, on March 27, 2017, in the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D (27:3) of the victim D (27:) in Gwangju-si; and (b) the Defendant, in a large voice, sing the victim into a large voice, sing the victim; and (c) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by avoiding disturbance.

2. On March 31, 2017, around 17:30, the Defendant obstructed the business of around 17:30 on March 31, 2017, at the above “E” restaurant operated by the Victim D (27:30 on March 31, 2017, the Defendant demanded the victim to pay the meal cost with 1,000 Won 2 and 1-2 chip from the victim without any justifiable reason after drinking boom.

For about 30 minutes, such as the noise of ‘unauthorizedness', the victim interfered with the restaurant business of the victim by force by avoiding disturbance.

3. On March 31, 2017, the Defendant: (a) arrested and taken custody of a flagrant offender in the act of crime listed in paragraph (2) at the G box of the Gwangju Police Station located in Gwangju City on March 31, 2017; (b) served on the police box affiliated with the above police box; (c) served on his/her clothes and head on his/her cryp; and (d) served on his/her cryp and put him/her in coffee; and (c) put him/her into coffee; and (d) put him/her away “to keep him/her off.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

4. On March 31, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the business of around 21:50 on March 31, 2017, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance for about one hour, such as under the influence of alcohol at the victim J (Inn, 42 years of age) who works in Gwangju City as an employee of the said employee, and smoking in the drinking house without any justifiable reason. The Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by avoiding disturbance by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to Inspector H (victim);

1.With respect to D and J, respectively.

arrow