logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.07.18 2017고단2352
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In order to promote a more efficient increase in forestry management and forestry income through the fireproof and scale of forestry income business, the Gisung group promoted the "D development project" as part of a public contest for forest income business in 2012, and in order to select a competitive and excellent producers' organization, it reviewed and assessed the qualification and business plan for the producers' organization, such as agricultural partnership corporations, and selected eligible persons, and 60% (40% of national expenses, 20% of military expenses) out of the total project expenses to be selected.

In addition, the terms and conditions of the above subsidy grant should not use the selected subsidy for other purposes, and after the completion of the project, the relevant documents, etc. are submitted to settle the details of the execution of the subsidy (settlement of the subsidized project), and the qualifications and requirements for application for public recruitment shall be small group or producers group, and at least five of the members of the agricultural partnership among the producers' organizations shall be farmers, and the total amount of the subsidy shall be at least KRW 100,000,000, and the results of operation after the establishment shall be at least one year.

On August 201, the Defendant came to know of the fact that the Defendant intended to select a subsidized project operator of the “D Development Project 2012” (hereinafter “the instant project”) via Jeonnam-do in the Korea Forest Service, and applied for a public recruitment in the name of the EF corporation established for the selection of the subsidized project. Once selected as a subsidized project operator, the Defendant intended to receive a false construction contract, tax invoice, etc. from the victimized party by submitting a false construction contract, tax invoice, etc. to the Massung group for settlement.

Accordingly, the Defendant is in the forest department and office of the Masan National Forest Service before early September 201.

arrow