beta
Text
Defendant
A and B Imprisonment for six months, and the defendant C and D agricultural partnership shall be punished by a fine of three million won, respectively.
Defendant .
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Basic Facts] In order to strengthen the competitiveness of the livestock industry by facilitating the production and use of domestic research fees, reducing production costs, etc., the victim creative city promoted "F" to support the purchase cost of the production site of research fees (such as wood and dried, etc. with high textile content, and low energy content) and select the target for subsidization at the request of producers' organizations, such as agricultural partnership corporations, etc., and select the target for subsidization. The ratio of self-payment out of the total project cost of about 60% of the project cost to be changed from about 50-60% of the total project cost per year, according to the decision to grant subsidies from Changwon-si, and then submit a report of completion of the project accompanied by relevant evidentiary documents to submit the report of completion of the project, the victim shall pay the remainder of the project cost, excluding self-payment.
An agricultural partnership for such selection as a subsidy program operator shall have at least KRW 100 million, and at least five members shall be appointed, and the members shall have a track record of collaborative management of agriculture and conducting research fees business for at least one year.
In addition, the subsidized project operator should faithfully implement the subsidized project in accordance with the laws, the purpose of granting subsidies, the details and terms of the subsidized project, and not engage in any unfair act related to the subsidy, and should not use and manage the agricultural machinery purchased with the subsidy jointly with the members of the corporation, and should not be justified.
[2] The criminal facts of Defendant A are as follows: (a) the representative director of the D farming association; (b) the director of the said farming association; (c) the operator of G selling agricultural machinery such as Trackers; and (d) the Defendant D farming association (hereinafter “D”) the production and sale of research fees connected to the farming association that produces the plant products of a breeding farm around January 19, 2012 and supplies food to livestock.