logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.08.22 2013고정1561
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In collusion with B, the Defendant received a false traffic accident from the insurance company, and conspired to use vehicles for traffic accident borrowing and lending from the rental car company.

On July 15, 2012, the Defendant accepted an accident to the effect that Samsung Fire caused a traffic accident by taking vehicle B while driving the vehicle, and B said, at the victim D office located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant received insurance from Samsung Fire as the victim due to the occurrence of a traffic accident during the operation of the vehicle,” and that “The Defendant would rental the vehicle” at the victim D office located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

However, the above traffic accident was falsely received by the victim, and the victim was not able to receive the car rental fee from the insurance company, and the defendant and B did not have the intention or ability to pay the car rental fee normally.

Nevertheless, B received immediately from the victim the Fk7 vehicle from the victim and operated it until July 31, 2012.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the victim B, operated the above vehicle without paying KRW 2,665,60,00 from the victim, thereby obtaining property benefits equivalent to the above amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A complaint, or a vehicle lease contract;

1. The investigation report (amount claimed for siren costs - amount of damage), and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (tri volume fire currency);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow