Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of C in the south-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu.

Where a fire-fighting system of a specific fire-fighting object fails to be installed, maintained, or managed in accordance with the fire safety standards pursuant to Article 9 (2) of the Act on Fire Prevention and Installation, Maintenance, and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems, the director general of the fire-fighting headquarters or the head of the fire station may order an interested

On October 21, 2015, the Defendant failed to comply with the corrective order, such as the postponement of the period for correction and supplementation (the period for correction: from November 9, 2015 to February 8, 2016) and the failure to comply with the corrective order, such as the defect of pressure pressure water supply system, defect of reducer, sound system, defect of sound system, defect of transmission system, defect of transmission system, etc., which are the fire-fighting system of C, as a result of the on-site verification of fire prevention and installation, maintenance, and safety control of fire-fighting systems, around 15:0 on February 18, 2016 to 16:00, on around 16:00 on the same day, the Defendant did not comply with the corrective order, such as the postponement of the period for correction (the period for correction: the period for correction: the period for correction; and

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes stated in the report on the violation of fire-fighting-related Acts and subordinate statutes and the order for correction and supplementation (including

1. Article 48-2 and subparagraph 1 of Article 48-2 and Article 9 (2) of the Act on the Installation, Maintenance, and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order has a record of being sentenced to two times a fine due to the crime of this type, on the other hand, the defendant appears to have performed fire-fighting system installation works after the crime, and there is no record of criminal punishment either punished by the same crime or by the fine exceeding