logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.10.26 2015고단1068
야간건조물침입절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【2015 Height1068】

1. Night-time theft of buildings;

A. On November 2, 2014, at around 22:06, the Defendant: (a) registered any gaps in the E mobile phone store operated by the victim D located in Eunpyeong-gu C; (b) opened a corrected entrance to the access security system; and (c) invaded into the entrance security system; and (d) stolen KRW 20,000 in cash owned by the victim and stored in the atmosphere.

B. On November 7, 2014, at around 00:32, the Defendant stolen the cash of KRW 150,000,000 owned by the victim, which was invaded into the store in the same manner as that of the preceding paragraph.

C. On November 8, 2014, at around 01:12, the Defendant: (a) invaded into the store in the same manner as that of the preceding paragraph and stolen cash owned by the victim, which was located in the West; (b) 80,000 won.

2. At around November 5, 2014, the Defendant thefted 50,000 won in cash owned by the victim D located in the E mobile phone store operated by the victim D located in Eunpyeong-gu, on November 5, 2014.

【2015 Highest 2880】 The Defendant is a person who has served as an ELS G member in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On June 24, 2014, the Defendant, without authority, forged an application for entering a mobile phone in the mobile phone entry application under the name of the applicant J and I with the intent to exercise the right in the EL Plus G located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the mobile phone entry application without authority.

B. On August 22, 2014, for the purpose of exercising the right at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant, without authority, forged an application for mobile phone entry in the mobile phone entry application with the following: (a) the Defendant, without authority, had a person who was unaware of his/her circumstances, to enter the mobile phone entry application in the name of “portable phone K, subscriber name I, resident registration number I: J, and applicant I”; and (b) forged the application

C. The Defendant on October 31, 2014.

arrow