beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,00, and by a fine of KRW 2,500,000, respectively.
The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving of Cwing-3 cargo vehicles.
At around 07:20 on June 25, 2018, the Defendant was proceeding directly from the 17 km direction of the Central Highway of Geumsan-si.
Since there have occurred a traffic accident at the time, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle, such as maintaining a safety distance and thoroughly reducing the duty at the time of front-time.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting the above duty of care, received a set-off car driven by D, which was driven by the negligence that occurred prior to the driving of the vehicle due to the foregoing cargo vehicle, and had the said cargo vehicle driven by the victim E (the age of 40) prior to the stopping of the FK7 car, and again caused the victim G to have the back-wing vehicle driven by the victim G, which caused the traffic accident prior to the traffic accident, the Defendant again caused the victim G to have the front part of the said K7 car.
As a result, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, damaged the victim E with salt, tensions, etc. of damage which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time damaged the K7 car to be in excess of KRW 4,400,372 of repair cost, and KRW 396,00 of repair cost.
2. Defendant B
(a) No motor vehicle owner who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any motor vehicle on a road on which no mandatory insurance is subscribed;
Nevertheless, the Defendant operated Cwing-3 Cargo Vehicles at the date, time, and place of the above Paragraph (1) by having A drive them.
B. When the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, at the time and place of the above Paragraph (1) above, caused A, an employee, to drive the C 3 truck, a k7 vehicle as stated in the above Paragraph (1) due to occupational negligence, to damage the 396,000 won of the repair cost, as stated in the above Paragraph (1) above.
Summary of Evidence
1..