Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On Oct. 4, 2016, the Defendant altered private documents, stating “Until July 3, 2017,” in the column of the contract term of the standard work contract for part-time workers, prepared in the name of E, on July 4, 2016, in D Co., Ltd. located in Daegu Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daegu, by means of a tamp-shaped pen.”

For the purpose of exercising, the Defendant modified a chapter of standard labor contract for part-time workers under the name of E, a private document on rights and duties.

2. On March 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) submitted to the F of the Labor Supervisor who knows that he/she had completed a modified labor contract as stated in the foregoing paragraph at the Daegu District Labor Management Office Branch Office Section 2 of the Daegu District Labor Management Office, which was located in 301, Seogu, Seogu, Daegu District Office; and (b) exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A complainant, a written complaint (a written complaint submitted) - A written further statement, an investigation report (a written employment contract submitted by the Daegu Western Employment Center), a reply, a labor contract submitted by the Daegu Western Employment Center, an investigation report (a labor contract submitted by the subordinate branch office of the Daegu Regional Labor Office), a response, a labor contract submitted by the subordinate branch office of the Daegu Regional Labor Office, and an investigation report (the date and place of exercise of an changed labor contract) shall be governed by statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of altered private documents), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising altered private documents), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the Defendant’s mistake in depth and reflects his fault; (b) the Defendant was the initial offender; and (c) the Defendant agreed with the victim in the case of violating the Labor Standards Act, which was at issue with the instant case; and (d) the Defendant was determined to have been granted an unfair delivery in relation to the instant case.