The defendant shall be innocent.

The summary of the facts charged is the victim E (V, 53 years old) and a person who operated the same business from October 16, 2016 to the second floor in Gwangju-gu, Seo-gu.

At around 23:30 on February 16, 2016, the Defendant inflicted two injuries on the victim’s knife and knife the victim’s knife in two hands on the ground that the victim demanded to distribute the profits of the said knife within the said knife point and damaged the victim’s knife and knife the victim’s knife and knife the floor for two weeks.

However, the Defendant asserts to the effect that even though there was a little vision between the victim and the victim at the time of the instant case, he did not go beyond the floor by putting the head debt of the victim.

First, there are evidence corresponding to the facts charged, there are statements of the victim's investigative agency, written complaint and legal testimony, F's legal testimony and written confirmation, and written diagnosis.

First, I will examine the victim's statement part.

In the criminal complaint and the criminal complaint investigation at the police level, the victim made a statement to the effect that “the head and the neck of the defendant, at the time of the instant case, faced with the wall and sustained injuries by the victim, by putting him/her with his/her head debt and sealed on the wall.”

Then, in the court, the testimony was made to the effect that “the defendant was faced with head on the Ama floor when another person was removed from the head, and the head was faced on February 11, 2016.”

As above, upon the partial change of the victim’s statement, the facts charged in the instant case changed from “the Defendant, in two descendants, caused the victim’s head debt and the head and clothes attached to the wall by putting the victim’s head debt against the wall, resulting in the victim’s injury” to “the Defendant, in two hands, sustained the victim’s head debt and damaged the victim’s body above the floor.”

On the other hand, in this Court, F means that “The Defendant appeared to have earned the victim’s head at the time of the instant case, but did not see who was above the floor.”