A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who engages in the livestock product sales business and meat packaging business under the trade name of “stock company D” in Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

1. Operators engaged in meat packaging and treatment business in violation of the Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act shall indicate the name and location of the place of business on the packaged meat produced and shall not indicate it falsely;

Nevertheless, from July 13, 2013 to October 15, 2013, the Defendant indicated the name of the place of business by falsely indicating the manufacturing cost and sales cost as indicated in the above corporation D, and the name of the place of business, which is the actual place of business, in indicating the manufacturing cost and sales cost to the chiller, which is the package meat produced (95% of the chickens, glutinous rice, rice, rice, large dust, and 5% of the clutinous rice).

2. No products, the expiration date of which has passed shall be displayed, stored, or sold for sale purposes, nor shall such products be used for manufacturing or processing foods, etc.;

Nevertheless, around October 15, 2013, the Defendant manufactured scopic meat by inserting rice, scopic, ginseng, etc. inside copics in copics, and used products, the distribution period of which expires by using large trends until October 12, 2013, for manufacturing and processing food.

3. No goods on which a trademark identical or similar to the registered trademark of another person in violation of the Trademark Act is indicated shall be used;

Nevertheless, from August 31, 2012 to October 15, 2013, the Defendant entered D’s name, and the name of “G” in the advertisement street (F), published the route in which “G” was inscribed, and entered “G” in the packaging paper made by scambling scambling scams (use in total 28,980 on packaging paper) and used the trademark of “G” in the same name as “G,” a trademark registered as H, thereby infringing on the trademark of G by using the trademark of the same name as “G,” a trademark registered as H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the accused.