beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From August 27, 2007, the Defendant is a management director of “A Co., Ltd. E” engaged in food manufacturing and processing business that produces food, etc. to infants and young children from the 3,5,6, and the 3,5,6, and the 6,000-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building D.
1. No manufacturer or processor of foods in violation of the Food Sanitation Act shall use such products for the manufacture or processing of foods, etc., the expiration of circulation period;
The defendant from August 25, 2015 to the same year.
9. Until April 2, 2015, “stock company E” manufactured and stored the total amount of KRW 792 “exploited bamboo” using the defloited powder that had already passed on August 21, 2015 as raw materials, and the market price of KRW 1,306,80, and then used products, the expiration of which was due, for manufacturing and processing food, etc.
2. No person who violates the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products shall make a false indication of origin or make an indication which may cause confusion as to the origin;
The Defendant, using the Chinese political party, Chinese scarcity, etc. as raw materials, manufactured the reasoning consciousness, etc., and displayed and sold it as if it used the domestic scarcity, domestic scarcity, etc.
The defendant from January 1, 2015 to the same year.
9. Until August 9, 200, in manufacturing “F”, “F” made use of a Chinese testinology in manufacturing “F” and “F”, the product’s country of origin was falsely indicated on the surface of the product as “F” in the manner of indicating “testination”, “F” and “F” on the surface of the product.
B. The Defendant from April 9, 2015 to the same year.
9. By August 9, 200, in manufacturing the reasoning awareness, such as the above “stock company E” and “G”, the Defendant falsely indicated the origin of the product equivalent to KRW 595,267,200 in total of 32 products, including “G”, by indicating “domestic products” on the outer side of the product in the manner of indicating “domestic products.”
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A, A.