logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.14 2017고단7603
공갈미수
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[The relationship between the defendant and the victim] The defendant was the victim C(63 tax) and the defendant who was a dong in high school. In 1994, the defendant took care of his wife from his wife in his unmarried defendant's wife in 1994 and his wife in order to find out his wife that he was abandoned by his wife, and received 400 million won from the victim. The defendant went to Canada in 1999 and lost the nationality of the Republic of Korea around February 2003.

[2] The Defendant: (a) from around 1999 to around 4 years in Canada, operated food stores and other businesses; (b) thereafter, failed in Korea while running restaurant business in Korea; and (c) returned to Canada, which made it difficult to receive economic assistance, such as hiring patrolmen on November 2014; (c) however, the Defendant found the victim’s company in order to obtain economic assistance, such as hiring patrolmen. However, there were all the causes that the relationship with immigration, business failure, and wifes with the victim who did not move to Canadian, Canadian, and Canadian; (d) the victim was the victim.

I think the victim, threatened the victim to receive the compensation from the victim.

On November 27, 2014, around 11:30 on November 27, 2014, the Defendant conducted one person demonstration by putting in front of the E Building where the victim located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D the content that “one person demonstration commences in consideration of the ility of the chairperson of the Korean highest educational business,” and puts one person demonstration on November 28, 2014, with the content that “(ju), for the reason of being the chairperson, the chairman, and the chairman, and the other party, it would be difficult to see that the Defendant’s one person demonstration.”

arrow