Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On February 21, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on September 11, 2015 by the Chuncheon Prison.

[2018 Highest 4656] The Defendant intended to sell and purchase the victim B and the building D (hereinafter “instant building”) located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. On January 10, 2018, when the victim first set up the right to collateral security through the instant building and expressed his/her intent to purchase it thereafter, he/she had the intention to acquire money by deceiving the victim by deceiving him/her.

1. On January 2018, the Defendant and “E” entered the column for the location of the file format of the computer’s real estate lease contract, into the column for the location of the computer’s real estate lease contract, “Yeo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 30,000,000 won,” and “Y-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F,” “G,” and “H” into the address column in the lessee’s column, and then affixed a seal of H’s name, which he/she was aware of in advance, on the side of the lessee’s name.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the “E”, forged one copy of the real estate lease contract in the name of H, a private document on rights and obligations, for the purpose of exercising the rights and obligations.

2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

A. On January 18, 2018, the Defendant sent a file recording one copy of the forged real estate lease agreement to the victim’s cell phone in Seoul Northern District Court near the Seoul Northern District Court located in Dobong-gu Seoul, Seoul Northern District Court, 749, and the building of this case that the Defendant intended to sell and purchase to the victim was only 30 million won deposit in the building of this case.

B. On January 24, 2018, the Defendant raised an question as to whether only 30,000 won deposit exists in the instant building at the victim’s office located in a Buddhist area in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. As such, the Defendant raised an question as to whether only 3,000 won deposit exists in the instant building, one copy of the forged real estate lease agreement