A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Central District Court on February 4, 2010, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 17, 2010. On August 14, 2013, the Seoul Western District Court sentenced two years of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court on August 18, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 8, 2015, by being sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual larceny at the Seoul Southern District Court on October 8, 2015, the judgment became final and conclusive on October 16, 2015, and around February 23, 2017, a person who was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for more than three years by larceny, etc. and is under repeated crime.

[Criminal Facts]

1. On February 26, 2017, the Defendant discovered that the victim C (the victim, the age of 26) opened handbags to board the subway and contacted the transportation cards with the subway stations in front of the opening of the first floor underground in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government (the age of 26) around 20:35, in front of the opening of the first floor in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government (the age of 190,000,000,000 won, in cash) around February 26, 2017, the Defendant collected losses from the back of the victim, thereby gathering them into the handbag, with a cash of 40,000 won.

In addition to theft by a method, as described in the list of crimes in the attached Form, the victim stolen the total amount of KRW 1,100,000 from the victims five times from around that time to October 20, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment more than three times due to larceny, etc. and stolen the victims' objects despite the period of repeated crime.

2. On July 7, 2017, the Defendant violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act (hereinafter “Electronic Financial Transactions Act”) is obvious that the “2:07:07” of the indictment is a clerical error (see, e.g., investigation report (see, e., victim’s additional telephone statement and CCTV investigation; 401 pages of evidence records); and it appears that there is no substantial disadvantage to the Defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense, thereby recognizing ex officio correction.

'E convenience points in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City(Seoul Special Metropolitan City) are 4,500 won of tobacco 1 A and the crime list No. 4 is the same as the crime list No. 1.