logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.10.22 2014나13820
대여금
Text

1. The following amounts, among the parts concerning the principal lawsuit of the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be payable:

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case in this case is as follows, and the defendant added or added part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows, and it is identical to the statement in Article 1, 2, and 3 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in addition to adding the judgment of the court of first instance as to the matters alleged in the court of second instance as stated in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or additional parts] No. 3 20 of the 3rd page “20 million won” is considered as “18 million won” and “7.5 million won” as “82 million won.”

“26,872,740 won” of the 4th 5th 5th 5th 122,747,260 won calculated by subtracting the above 26,872,740 won on the assumption that or at least the above-mentioned rent interest is KRW 149,620,00.

“94,66,178 won” of the 4th sentence is deemed to be “101,66,178 won”, and the 9th sentence’s “25,000,000 won” is deemed to be “18,00,000 won.”

Part 5 (5) of the 5th page "paid" is regarded as "paid."

Part 6 of the 6th page “Entry of No. 2” is understood as “The entry of No. 26 and No. 2”.

Following the “fact-finding” of the 6th page 7, following the Daejeon District Court’s 2014Da215052, 2015Kadan9124 (Joint), the lessor G paid the Plaintiff A KRW 17,737,000 (=25,00,000 lease deposit - management fee - KRW 7,263,000) with respect to the above shopping district lease.

The 6th page “Plaintiff” in the 9th page is regarded as “Plaintiffs.”

Of the 6th page 12 and 13, “5.44 million won (=10 million won - 2.5 million won - 2.366 million won)” is “58,703,000 won (=100,000,000 won - 17,737,000 won - 23,560,000 won).”

Part 6 of the 6th page 20 states "I am evidence" as "I am evidence and evidence Nos. 12, 17, and 23."

Part VII, 17 to 20, "However, there is a difference," as follows:

“However, evidence No. 25, evidence No. 25, evidence No. 26, 27, 31, and 47 (including a number; hereinafter the same shall apply).

arrow