logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 07. 14. 선고 2016두38754 판결
(심리불속행 기각) 이 사건 양도토지는 8년 자경 농지에 해당되지 않음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu-48107 (20 April 20, 2016)

Title

(Republic Trial Disorder Dismissal) The transferred land of this case does not constitute farmland around eight years.

Summary

Where a clan member cultivates farmland in accordance with the responsibility and calculation of a clan, he/she may be deemed to be a direct cultivation, but it shall not be deemed to constitute a direct cultivation in cases where he/she conducts cultivation by proxy or entrusted cultivation without his/her responsibility and calculation of farming expenses.

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2016Du38754

Plaintiff

△△△△△△△△

Defendant

Head of △ District Office

Imposition of Judgment

July 14, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

July 14, 2016

arrow