logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.09.28 2017고정771
업무상과실치사등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 2016, the Defendant was awarded a contract from a cooperative in Kimpo-si to “B underground roadways and external wall surface glimping work” located in Kimpo-si, and the Defendant separated the “fluoring work on the ground of wall surface,” which is part of the work, and gave a subcontract to D for repair, painting, and waterproof Construction Business Co., Ltd., Ltd.; E is the operator of D Co., Ltd.; on November 29, 2016, around the construction site; around November 15:30, 2016, while performing the above painting work contracted by the Defendant; and the victim F (71 years of age) of a daily worker employed by the said company had the victim F (hereinafter referred to as the “F”) engage in the work of painting on the wall surface of the above company at a height of 3.5 meters from the surface of the wall.

In the above work, there is a risk of industrial accidents that workers fall down and fall down or lose life. Thus, in order to prevent industrial accidents that may arise at the time of the above work, the Defendant, a subcontractor E and a contractor, who is the victim’s user, has a duty of care to ensure that the damaged person, in the above work site, provides the above workers with protective outfits, such as safety caps, safety belts, etc., to wear them at the work site, to conduct the work at the work site by means of assembling the bridge, etc., and to take safety measures under the Industrial Safety and Health Act for the prevention of industrial accidents, such as taking measures to prevent the death or the collapse of the bridge in the event of the work by using the bridge, and to thoroughly manage and supervise the above measures. Thus, the Defendant has a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of death or the occurrence by the injured person while performing the above work.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, while neglecting to do so jointly, failed to have the victims wear protective outfits, such as safety features and sub-leases, etc., and did not take measures to prevent slicks from being slicking or beyond the ford, are mixed with the above work on the slick bridge.

arrow