The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person who is engaged in driving a passenger car in the CCordo.

On September 17, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on September 17, 2012, and proceeded with the Korean ENCOM front of the DanCOM, which is located on the front side of the DanCOM, from the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the DanCOM.

In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to see the front side and safely drive the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by negligence, neglected to neglect the Jeonju-si, received the victim's body part of the victim D (the age of 14 at the time of the accident) who was faced with the seat of the large seat from the ethical ethical ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim, such as the depression of euthanasia, due to the above occupational negligence, thereby causing the victim to be imprisoned or incurablely ill.

2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records, the victim can recognize the fact that he/she expressed his/her intention not to prosecute the defendant after instituting the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327