1.(a)

The defendant Republic of Korea is the Ulsan District Court with respect to each land listed in the separate sheet to the defendant B, C, D, E, and F.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1) The Plaintiff, as a child of the network G, was inherited by the deceased’s other inheritors in around 2014 through the agreement on the division of inherited property. (2) Defendant B, C, D, E, and F are the deceased’s property successors.

B. Division and ownership relationship of each land listed in the separate sheet 1) The land of this case is 658 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) prior to Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, and the other land is referred to as “the instant land” only once less than J.

The ownership transfer registration was completed in L on May 25, 1942. On December 29, 1989, the land of this case was changed to “site” on September 27, 1966, the land category was changed to “site”; on September 4, 2002, the area was 567 square meters in size was divided into each land listed in the separate sheet on December 10, 2002.

C. 1) The Plaintiff’s father, G, the father of the instant land, was killed while residing in the instant land by newly building a cement tank and a branch roof house on the instant land around 1965. 2) The instant building was registered as a preservation of ownership on April 27, 2002, and the Plaintiff is currently residing in the Plaintiff.

On March 28, 1942 (Fire 17), the sale certificate for the land of this case owned by the plaintiff of the sale certificate concerning the land of this case contains a statement that K having his domicile in M sold the land of this case to the same L on March 28, 1942 (Fire 17).

[Reasons for Recognition] Defendant Republic of Korea: The non-contentious facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6, 7, 11, and 12 (including those with additional numbers), the whole purport of the pleadings, and the remaining Defendants except the defendant Republic of Korea: Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act (a confession made due to the absence of the defendants)

2. Determination

A. L, which was registered as the owner of the instant land as the Plaintiff’s assertion by the parties, is a Korean network H, not a Japanese person.

In this case.