logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.05.29 2019가단75238
건물인도
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: (a) the real estate listed in [Attachment] Section 1;

B. Defendant C shall set out in attached list 2.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 5, 2018, the Plaintiff leased the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 1 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to Defendant B with the lease deposit of KRW 76 million, the lease deposit of KRW 31,000,000, the lease term of KRW 680,000 (the lease deposit was changed to KRW 21,000,000, the rent was changed to KRW 863,30,000,000, and KRW 863,30,000,000,000).

(hereinafter “instant lease contract”). B.

On September 26, 2017, the Plaintiff leased the real estate listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table No. 2 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to Defendant C as KRW 76 million, monthly rent of KRW 680,000,000 (the deposit for the post-lease was changed to KRW 21 million, monthly rent of KRW 863,30,000).

(hereinafter “instant lease contract”). C.

Defendant B, according to the instant lease agreement, ① the instant real estate, and Defendant C, pursuant to the instant lease agreement, occupy the instant real estate upon delivery.

On the other hand, the Defendants did not pay more than three times the rent under each of the instant lease agreements, and a duplicate of the complaint of this case stating the Plaintiff’s declaration of termination of each of the instant lease agreements on the grounds of delinquency in rent was delivered to the Defendants respectively.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 to 6 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the judgment on the grounds of the claim, each of the instant lease agreements was lawfully terminated.

Therefore, Defendant B is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff, and Defendant C are obligated to deliver each of the instant real estate.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow