1. The Defendant shall each month from September 29, 201 to September 2011, from September 45, 200,000 to September 29, 2013.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) On December 29, 2011, the Plaintiffs leased the real estate indicated in the Attachment, with the lease deposit amount of KRW 2.5 million to Lee Jae-do Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nuri Construction”), KRW 1.5 million per month for rent, and the lease period of rent from January 29, 2012 to January 28, 2014. At that time, the Plaintiffs received the lease deposit amount of KRW 2.5 million from the present construction, and handed over the real estate listed in the Attachment to this Freeboard Construction.

D. Then, since the present construction failed to perform its obligation to pay the rent, etc. under the above lease agreement to the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the present construction seeking delivery or overdue rent, etc. of the real estate stated in the separate sheet, which was caused by the termination of the above lease agreement, and around that time, the plaintiffs was sentenced to a judgment accepting the claims of the plaintiffs in

B. (1) around that time, Plaintiff A agreed to be paid KRW 5 million for the lease deposit to the Defendant, KRW 1.55 million for the lease deposit, KRW 1.5 million for the lease term, and KRW 1.5 million for the lease term from September 29, 2013 to September 28, 2014, and KRW 5 million for the compensation of damages if the Defendant did not deliver the real estate indicated in the attached Form to Plaintiff A to the Plaintiff by September 28, 2014, the Plaintiff A agreed to be paid the said amount by deducting the said amount from the lease deposit.

(hereinafter “instant agreement”). The Plaintiff A received the lease deposit amount of KRW 5 million from the Defendant at around that time and delivered the real estate indicated in the attached Form to the Defendant.

B. On September 29, 2013, the Defendant breached the obligation to pay the rent to Plaintiff A after September 29, 2013 under the instant lease agreement. On August 18, 2014, Plaintiff A sent to the Defendant a document stating the Defendant’s intent to terminate the instant lease agreement on the ground of the Defendant’s breach of the obligation to pay the rent, and the said document reached the Defendant around that time.

[Grounds for recognition] Unsatisfy, A No. 1.