beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Reason] The Defendant was a relative on December 5, 2012
D There was a fact that 15 million won was ordinarily joint and several sureties in the process of receiving a loan (from December 5, 2012 to December 5, 2017) from “Personal Savings Bank” (hereinafter referred to as “Personal Savings Bank”), and thereafter, it was filed a lawsuit from “Personal Asset Management Loan Co., Ltd., Ltd., which purchased the above “Personal Savings Bank”, and the relevant judgment was rendered, and it was sentenced to the lawsuit, and the seizure was made to nullify the relevant joint and several sureties obligation in order to enter his/her deposit return claim, etc., which is his/her own property. During the process of receiving the above loan, D, the principal borrower column of his/her proxy, the joint and several guarantor column of credit transaction agreement, D’s forgery of private documents, and false accusation as the crime of forging documents and the crime of investigating documents.
[Specific criminal facts] On May 23, 2017, the defendant submitted a written complaint to the public prosecutor's office of the Jeonjin-gu Seoul District public prosecutor's office located in Geumcheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, to punish Defendant D as the crime of forging private documents and the crime of forging the above investigation documents, and the contents thereof are as follows.
In the process of borrowing KRW 15 million from the Smart Savings Bank on December 5, 2012, Defendant D forged and exercised the column of joint and several guarantors of the credit transaction agreement in the name of the complainant and the joint and several guarantors of the neighboring guarantee letter. On the 13th of the same month, Defendant D forged and uses a letter of delegation in the name of the complainant, which would be punished as the crime of forging a private document and the crime of forging the above investigation document. However, on December 5, 2012, the Defendant had D prepare the column of joint and several guarantors of the credit transaction agreement and sent it to the Smart Savings Bank on the 13th of the same month.
After all, the defendant filed a false complaint for the purpose of punishing D, and rejected D.