logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.04.29 2016고정688
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was in charge of the collection of non-performing loans at the Credit Management Team located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D.

On September 2012, the Defendant secured the G land in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and took over a loan amounting to KRW 3,150,000,000 from the NA.

At this time, the victim later prepared a letter of guarantee in the meaning of an agreement to provide the building to be newly constructed on the said secured land as a security for the above obligation and submitted it to the NAF.

In this letter, the victim only affixed a seal to the joint guarantor's column, and the person in charge of the agricultural cooperative has not been prepared in the debtor's column, the debtor's column, and the debtor's debt column.

1. For the purpose of uttering, on April 2015, the Defendant completed the collateral guarantee guarantee certificate under the name of the victim, stating in the column of “H” in the column of the Person in Charge of Agricultural Co., Ltd. the damage incurred by the injured party, instead of preparing it as above, in the column of the Person in Charge of Agricultural Co., Ltd., the amount of the “H” debt, which was left in the column of the Person in Charge of Agricultural Co., Ltd., the Defendant’s possession of private document.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a letter of collateral guarantee in the name of the victim to the effect that the victim is a joint and several surety for the Defendant’s obligation of KRW 3.95 billion that Nonparty H must repay to EF.

2. On May 6, 2015, the Defendant: (a) filed an application for provisional attachment on real estate owned by the victim at the Incheon District Court’s Seoul District Court’s Seoul District Court’s Seoul District Court’s 129 (dong), and the victim’s “2 parcel and K gas charging station”; (b) submitted the application document to the public official in charge, who did not know that the document was forged, along with a forged collateral guarantee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the prosecutor with respect to L;

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning M and N;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1.F's complaint (each statement of guarantee and provisional attachment of real estate, respectively.

arrow