A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates commercial sex acts in the name of “D” in the name of “Seoul Dong-gu Ctel” 1612, 1615.

On July 3, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 2,90,00 from two police officers belonging to the Incheon Southern Department, who pretended to be customers, as the price for commercial sex acts, and arranged commercial sex acts by providing the police officers with guidance as 1612 and 1615 of the above business place waiting to be employees of E and F, which are employees of E and F, and by arranging commercial sex acts. From May 2, 2015 to July 3, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 14 to 150,00 from many unspecified customers at the above business place as the price for commercial sex acts and provided them with 10,000 won among them, and arranged commercial sex acts by allowing them to have sexual intercourse with customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of G, F, and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Aggravation area of the act of arranging sexual traffic by applying the sentencing criteria (one year to three years);

2. The crime of this case, which is determined to be sentenced, is a business of arranging sexual traffic for about one-month period, such as employing two female employees through the Internet job offering site by leasing two officetelss, and advertising the Internet, etc., and the nature of the crime is very serious.

In particular, the Defendant committed a crime of arranging sexual traffic committed in the same officetel (C building B No. 11119) in 2014 and committed a second offense for business purposes despite the past record of receiving a summary order of KRW 5 million, so it is necessary to impose severe punishment corresponding to the Defendant’s attitude of law.

Therefore, it is therefore.