logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.06.19 2019노1450
특수상해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

A. Error of facts and misapprehension of legal principles spreads the beer to the victim's face during a dispute with the victim, and the victim also spreads the beer to the victim's face. The defendant only fells from the beer, and does not correspond to the victim's face, and even if the beer balance from the defendant's hand is faced with the victim's face, the defendant did not have any intention to injure the victim.

Therefore, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

A. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal doctrine, the Defendant intentionally assaulted the victim’s face as stated in the instant facts charged and inflicted injury on the victim.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

1) The victim, from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, made a concrete and consistent statement to the effect that he had the beer’s face, by ging the beer’s face from the Defendant to the Defendant’s face, and ging the beer’s face to the Defendant’s face, and ging the beer’s face to the Defendant’s face (No. 35,40 of the trial record, No. 14 of the evidence record) 2 of the instant case, upon receipt of the instant report and the police officer dispatched to the police agency immediately after the instant case’s arrival, the victim was the victim’s am was the victim (Evidence No. 5 and 8 of the evidence record) and the victim’s injury diagnosis document prepared by the doctor H, which states that it is necessary to provide four weeks’ treatment (No. 40 of the evidence record).

3 The defendant is faced with the face of the victim because beer residues is sleeped.

arrow