A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the enforcement of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) heard that the Defendant paid a fee equivalent to 5% of the amount of money to be deposited in the Defendant’s account by withdrawing the amount of money deposited in the Defendant’s account from a member of the commission of a telephone financial fraud, who was unable to know the name known through the mobile phone text advertisement; (b) informed the Defendant’s new bank account (D) and the national bank account (E) to a person whose name is unknown; and (c) made the money deposited in the account, and then withdrawn it.

1. On March 27, 2017, an employee who is not aware of the name of the crime against the victim F of the telephone finance fraud is a member of the National Bank Loan Business Department, which would allow the victim F to obtain a credit loan, and it is possible to make a new loan to repay the existing debt, and it is deposited into an account informing the victim F of the existing debt.

“Falsely speaking to the effect that it is “,” and that member was transferred from the victim to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant at around three times on March 28, 2017, KRW 10 million.

On March 28, 2017, at around 10:52, the Defendant withdrawn KRW 8 million out of the amount of damage transferred by the said injured party at the window of the Korean National Bank’s ordinary site located in Pyeongtaek-si, and then conveyed only the telephone financial fraud organization members with no knowledge of the name before the said bank, and continued to remain in the Defendant’s account at the cash withdrawal machine established in the same bank around 11:25 on the same day.

After further withdrawal of KRW 2 million, the telephone finance fraud organization was sent to the above bank with no name prior to the bank.

Accordingly, the Defendant was able to easily commit the fraud of telephone finance fraud officers who could not know their names.

2. On March 27, 2017, an employee who is unable to identify the name of the crime against the victim G was engaged in telephone financing fraud and misrepresenting the prosecution investigator and the prosecutor to post a telephone to the victim G around 15:18 on March 27, 2017, thereby leading the victim G to investigate by misrepresenting the victim G with the head of passbook in the name of the victim in the financial fraud case, and withdrawing the full deposit in the account in the victim’s name.