logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.09.06 2017고단1569
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) listened to the statement that the Defendant would pay KRW 100,000 per week by lending the name of the account from an employee who is an employee in charge of the crime of false telephone finance fraud, who is a named B head of the online finance office, and withdrawing the account; and (b) consented to the statement that the Defendant would pay KRW 100,000 per week; (c) notified the account number of two accounts, such as the national bank account (C) in the name of the Defendant; and (c) made a withdrawal of the money to the said account.

around 10:00 on February 23, 2017, a member in charge of the crime of false telephone finance fraud was called "The Seoul Regional Police Agency is the Seoul Regional Police Agency, and there was a large passbook and a large phone in the victim's name.

“In order to verify whether the property of the injured party is lawful or illegal,” the phrase “(s) shall be made by withdrawing and remitting all money in the name of the injured party in order to verify whether the property is a joint law,” and that date was remitted from the injured party to the above national bank account in the name of the accused at around 13:13 on the same day.

At around 14:01 on the same day, the Defendant received instructions from the head of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office to withdraw KRW 8 million out of the damage amount in cash on the counter, and then withdraws the total amount of KRW 10 million in cash from the automation device in cash, and then delivers the nameless telephone financing fraud officer waiting in the vicinity of the above bank.

As above, while allowing the Defendant to deposit and withdraw cash withdrawal amounting to KRW 10 million into the Defendant’s account without any awareness, the employees who receive money are waiting in the vicinity of the bank where CCTV was not installed, and the circumstances such as ordering the bank to make a false statement or withdrawing part of the counter and automation device with respect to the reason of withdrawal are non-regular and brupted. Thus, it is sufficiently recognizable that one’s act is related to illegal activities, such as telephone financing (one name “Sscam”).

arrow