logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.10.07 2014고단2076
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 21, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of 700,000 won of a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Gwangju District Court's Netcheon Branch on January 21, 201, and on August 11, 2014, the Defendant filed a request for a summary order of 1.5 million won of a fine for the same crime.

On August 2, 2014, at around 21:53, the Defendant: (a) driven a car under the police control and parked the car in the vicinity of the control place; (b) used the taxi in the taxi to drink a kind and drinking around the long-term drinking house in the city of Kimpo-si; (c) returned to the control place on August 3, 2014; and (d) confirmed that his/her vehicle was parked in as it is, and all police officers were parked, and (d) driven the vehicle under the influence of alcohol 0.108% of alcohol in the section of about 4 km from the control place to the front road of the yellow real estate agent gold-dong in the city of Kimpo-dong in Gyeonggi-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written report on driving under the influence of drinking drivers, a written report on the status of drinking drivers, and a written report on the results of the crackdown on drinking under the influence of drinking;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry reports, such as criminal records, investigation reports (former previous records, indictments, and summary orders attached);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the same Act applicable to the applicable criminal facts and the

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1548, Apr. 1, 2009);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution;

arrow