1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. As examined below, Plaintiff A is a person who received treatment on the operation of the hard disc and brain cerebrs, etc. from Defendant medical personnel in the National Health Insurance Corporation (hereinafter “Japan Hospital”) operated by the Defendant, and Plaintiff B is an infant of Plaintiff A.

The defendant is a juristic person established under the National Health Insurance Act and the Enforcement Decree thereof, and all medical professionals engaged in the operation and post-treatment of the plaintiff A (hereinafter referred to as "the defendant medical professionals").

B. The Plaintiff A’s judgment on the operation of Plaintiff A’s medical history and her Hemopic disc surgery was 194 students in 194. Since 195, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by high blood pressure and was under the implementation of the Memopic and Pharmaceutical Affairs Act. However, there was no other cerebrovascular or heart disease’s disease history.

Plaintiff

On January 26, 2015, A filed an appeal for the pass by the left-hand side, which was conducted on January 27, 2015 by the medical personnel of the Defendant, and as a result, A was diagnosed on the escape of conical signboards and the vertebrate so far as it was conducted on January 27, 2015.

The defendant medical personnel determined the plaintiff A as to the implementation of the ex post facto suppression and genomic surgery, explained that it is necessary to perform the surgery, and the plaintiff A also decided to undergo the surgery.

At the time, Plaintiff A was taking the Mex, Crox, and Croat (hereinafter above blood voltages). However, Plaintiff A had not used the Arox for one week prior to the date of taking the said Merox.

C. (1) On January 28, 2015, Plaintiff A hospitalized in the Gansan Hospital for an operation on January 28, 2015. (2) The said Plaintiff was showing symptoms of being affected without a heat and a guest room on January 29, 2015, the day before the operation. However, there was no special symptoms of infection.

3. On January 30, 2015, the above Plaintiff’s 170-minutes ex post facto suppressions under the Defendant’s Medical Doctor’s Housing.