1. The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiff A, KRW 27,782,769, and KRW 1,00,000 for the Plaintiff B, and KRW 3,00 for the Plaintiff C, D, E, and F, respectively.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant medical corporation’s status as the parties is a legal entity that operates a H hospital (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”); Defendant I served as the head of the division of the Defendant hospital. The Plaintiff A received the personal surgery at the Defendant hospital as follows; Plaintiff B’s spouse, Plaintiff C, D, E, and F are children of Defendant A and B.

B. (1) On November 2013, 2013, Plaintiff A taken CT photographs at the KNE’s KNH on the left shoulder, and as a result, Plaintiff A was solicited to undergo a close inspection at a general hospital, etc., while “the shoulder strings are cut.” (2) around February 3, 2014, Plaintiff A explained both shoulders and plouts at the Defendant hospital, etc.; and (3) following Defendant I’s recommendation to undergo the MRI inspection for the precise diagnosis of Defendant I, a doctor in charge, conducted the MRI inspection on both sides of February 4, 2014.

3) As a result of the inspection, Defendant I diagnosed that Plaintiff A’s each part of the backsides of the shoulder of both sides of the Plaintiff A had a spawn and spawn fever, Nos. 1, 2, and 4, and 5 in the spawn metrosis, and explained the Plaintiff A that it is necessary to conduct a revolving spawn spawn-out spawn-out spawn-out-out spawn-out spawn-out spawn-out spawn. (C. 1) On April 9, 2014, Plaintiff A hospitalized the Defendant hospital to conduct a pre-spawn-out-out spawn-out test, and the medical staff of Defendant I, including Defendant I conducted the spawn-out swn-out operation on the left side (hereinafter “instant operation”).

2) On April 17, 2014, at around 13:02, the Plaintiff filed an appeal with the same effect on the bridge. Defendant I visited the Plaintiff’s sick Room at around 13:27 and around 17:30 of the same day, and confirmed the Plaintiff A’s condition. Defendant I conducted the entire spine MRI inspection (wwwle spine MRI) using a steering agents at around 18:16.3) Defendant I confirmed the results of the MRI’s inspection, and is doubtful of the Plaintiff at around 19:51 on the same day.