logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(춘천) 2019.12.23 2018누1249
실시계획인가처분무효확인등
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims added by this court are all dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. The reasons for this part of the disposition are as follows, with the exception of the partial revision as follows, the pertinent part of the judgment of the court of first instance (from the second to the second half boxes at the bottom of 6 to 7 pages). Thus, this part of the reasoning is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Each “C” listed in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance shall be amended to the Defendant joining the Defendant.

The third party judgment of the first instance court’s 18th party judgment’s each disposition of the case’s “B” is modified to each initial disposition of the case’s.

Following the 7th top sentence of the judgment of the first instance, the 3rd sentence “the third project operator’s designation, the third project operator’s designation, and the 8th implementation plan modification disposition” were amended as the 3rd sentence “the 3rd project operator’s designation, the 3rd project operator’s designation, the 8th implementation plan modification disposition,” and the 8th implementation plan modification disposition (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “each of the above dispositions,” respectively.

2. Whether each of the dispositions of this case is lawful or invalidated

A. The reasoning for this part of the plaintiffs' common assertion is as follows, except for the deletion of some contents as follows, the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance (from 8th to 10th 21th ) is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the

Each “C” listed in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance shall be amended to the Defendant joining the Defendant.

The 8th judgment of the first instance is amended to “the Plaintiff’s assertion” as “the Plaintiff’s common assertion.”

The 10th judgment of the first instance court is amended to read “a null and void” of the 14th judgment as “a null and void.”

In the first instance judgment, the “common defect” of the first instance judgment No. 15 is deemed to be “3) invalidation or invalidation of each first disposition of this case,” and the “each disposition of this case” of the first instance judgment is deemed to be “each first disposition of this case.”

arrow