logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원(창원) 2020.07.15 2019누12336
해임처분결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons stated in this case by the court for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for modification or addition as stated in Paragraph 2.

Therefore, based on Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, it is quoted.

2. A part concerning correction or addition of the judgment of the first instance; and

A. Article 41 subparagraph 1 (c) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Building Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 26542, Sept. 22, 2015; hereinafter the same) shall be amended respectively to “final inspection” in the second five boxes of the same writing as “final inspection”; “other than related documents on the current status” in the same article of the same article of the same article of the same article of the same article of the same article of the same document of the same document shall be amended to “the content of the pre-construction works in the relevant current status documents”; “the mid-term inspection” in the third letter of the 26th box of the same article of the same article of the same article of the same Act shall be amended to “the completion inspection”; and “Article 41(1)3 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Building Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 26542, Sep

B. Defendant 4-10 of the 4th 9-10th am in a criminal case that was reversed and remanded to the Plaintiff as above, and the Changwon District Court convicted the Plaintiff of all of the charges of violating the Plaintiff’s Local Finance Act, excluding the fact of neglecting duties (not guilty), fraud, and attempted fraud. The court of first instance reversed the above part of the judgment and sentenced the Plaintiff a fine of KRW 10,000 (No. 1169 of Changwon District Court 2019No1169), and the said judgment became final and conclusive, “A-5, 21, and 21” of the 11st am in “A-5, 21, and 29 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply).”

(c) revise the “public inspection” of the 5th 13th 13th tier to the “final inspection”;

Pursuant to the 10th table "A, 4, 7, 8-10, 21, 21, and 7" of the 14th parallel "(2015)", "A, 7-10, 21, B, 2-7, 11, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 26, and 26 of the 10th parallel "A, 4, 7, 8-10, 21, 17, 18, 200, 20, 21, 23, 24, and 26, and part of the witness F

(e) “Disciplinary Reason” in the last 10th place of conduct.

arrow