logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.06.27 2014고단2881
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Joint criminal conduct by Defendant A and Defendant B

A. On February 9, 2014, around 03:00, the Defendants were in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury with deadly weapons, etc.) and were drinking alcohol within the “EM store” located in Busan Northern-gu, Busan, and had the F, who was the next table customer, take a bath to the said F. The Defendant was able to ask the said F. The Defendant asked the male-friendly male victim G (ma, 23 years old) of F, who took a bath to the F.

As a result, Defendant A added a less table to the victim, who was the victim, and the victim spreads it, and Defendant A was the victim’s face. Defendant B, who observed this, was the victim’s face by taking the victim’s face into consideration a small-scale disease, which is a dangerous object in the table table, and the victim’s face was 5 times as drinking, and the victim’s face was the victim’s face, which is a dangerous object in the table table.

Defendant A, who continued to observe this, led the back of the victim, sent the victim's face by drinking several times, cut the victim's arms over the floor, and Defendant B got the victim's face. Defendant B, which was a dangerous object in the side, followed the victim's face, and Defendant A, again, divided the victim's body into two hands to prevent the victim from going back to the front of the victim's body.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit an injury to the victim by carrying dangerous objects and taking them together, thereby causing approximately three weeks of medical treatment to the victim.

B. The Defendants who interfere with their business by disregarding the Defendants and continuing to do so, even though the victims H, the owner of the business at the above time and at the above place, had met several times.

arrow