Defendant

A In October of the imprisonment without prison labor, Defendant B in August of the imprisonment without prison labor, Defendant C in October of the imprisonment with prison labor, and Defendant D in fine 2,00.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C’s occupational death is a person who works as a swimming instructor and water safety personnel at a G swimming pool located in the 201st century F and the 6th century.

Defendant

B is the head of the department in the above G swimming pool and is the person in charge of the division of duties, the division of duties, and the organization and management of water safety personnel.

Defendant

C In operating the above G swimming pool, a person who exercises overall control over the organization and placement of swimming instructors and water safety personnel, and safety management affairs.

Defendant

A worked in the above G swimming pool as water safety personnel, and has a duty of care to take caution measures against users who have not taken protective gear, and to prevent accidents in advance, such as restricting the use of adult swimming tanks, etc. In particular, Defendant B and Defendant C had a duty of care to observe safety standards, such as assigning two or more water safety personnel who have obtained a license to the surveillance tower so that users can use the swimming pool safely.

Nevertheless, on December 13, 2014, Defendant B and Defendant C neglected this and assigned Defendant A as the only water safety personnel to work as the exclusive water safety personnel on the above swimming pool. Defendant A, at around 13:00 on the same day, knew that the victim H (the age of 6) entered and play water on an adult swimming tank with no protective gear, without being worn, was negligent by the negligence outside the same place as the one in the calculation of the value of the tax revenue, and at around 13:55 on the same day, Defendant B and Defendant C had the victim use the adult swimming tank without any restriction, and caused the victim to be in a safety accident leading to an unknown state, and failed to take prompt emergency measures.

Ultimately, the Defendants conspired to cause the above victim by negligence on the 16th of the same month, and the Government of the Gyeonggi-do Council around 05:55.