logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.20 2017나3397
공사대금 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff is the representative of C Chain Business Headquarters that processes the c for the c for the processing of the c for the supply of the c for the c for the c for the c for the c for the c for its franchise store. The Defendant joined the Plaintiff’s franchise store and operated E for E in Pyeongtaek-si from January 12, 2015 to November 10, 2015. Upon the Defendant’s request, the Plaintiff supplied the interior c for the construction work of KRW 33 million at the Defendant’s request on January 2, 2015, prior to the Defendant’s commencement of the business, the Plaintiff supplied the interior c for the c for the c for the c for the c for its construction work and received only KRW 22 million payment from the Defendant. Accordingly, the Defendant agreed to reduce the remaining construction price to KRW 4 million from the remainder 4 million for the construction price to the Plaintiff at the Defendant’s request.

Accordingly, the defendant paid the plaintiff the construction cost of KRW 20 million to the plaintiff, and the additional payment of KRW 2 million is the franchise.

B. The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the total construction cost exceeds KRW 20 million recognized by the Defendant and reaches KRW 33 million, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim is rejected.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow