logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2019.01.09 2018고정550
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the spouse of the 7th floor of the Gangseo-gu Busan, the 7th floor of the CR, and the victim E is the president of the FIN in the same floor, and the victim G is the president of the HPO in the same floor.

From January 2017, the defendant thought that the victims continued to do so for the purpose of treating the husband D from around 2017 to the victim's her husband D, and that the victims continued to talk about several times only with the victims.

However, the victims did not have the intention of suspicioning the husband of the defendant, and for this purpose, there was no record of the husband of the defendant.

1. On August 7, 2017, the Defendant, at around 18:00 on August 7, 2017, damaged the reputation of the victims by openly pointing out false facts in the corridor and toilet of the 7th floor of the above B building, even though the victims did not come out for the purpose of going to the Defendant’s husband and the Defendant’s husband, or not doing any speech or behavior for the purpose of deceptioning the Defendant’s refund to the Defendant’s husband, while the students who received lessons at the time and I want to receive a warning from January 1, 201 and I want to receive a yachting, “if the year would have been applied, the husband will be her husband, and if you want to do so, the husband will be her husband?”

2. On August 18, 2017, the Defendant of defamation of the 7th floor toilets of the above B building around August 18, 2017, despite that the victims were waiting to leave the Defendant’s husband for the purpose of going to the outside, or did not have any speech or behavior to commit a fraud by the Defendant’s husband, the Defendant attempted to remove the 7th class of female students who were sent the 7th class of a private teaching institute and were married with the her husband from the 7th class of a warning.

By speaking as ‘high interest', the honor of victims was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the prosecution concerning D;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statute on police statements to E, G and J;

1. Each relevant Article of the Act concerning criminal facts;

arrow