logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2015.06.17 2014가단32969
건물등철거
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) is not less than 16,310 square meters prior to Gangseo-gun E, Gangwon-do; (b)

(a)each point of the separate sheet No. 78, 79, 80, 78.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 11, 2002, the Plaintiffs completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the land of 16,310 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. On November 14, 201, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the 455 square meters (hereinafter “the adjoining land of this case”) located adjacent to the instant land, and around that time, the Defendant installed a container building, irrigation house, or bridge (hereinafter collectively “each of the instant facilities”) indicated in paragraph (1) on the neighboring land of this case. Of the instant land, among the instant land, the container building of this case is part of the Disposition 1-A of this case.

The part on the ship (c) part on which the port is entered shall be 1m2, and the well shall be 1.b.

Order 1.C. 1.0 m2m2 on board the port (4) part, and 1.0m2

It is installed in each part of the port (2) part of 18 square meters in a ship.

(Ground for recognition: Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 through 3, the result of the survey and appraisal by appraiser G, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination:

A. According to the facts of recognition of the plaintiffs' claims, the defendant is obligated to remove each of the facilities of this case on the ground of (c), (d) and (b) above among the land of this case and deliver each of the above land to the plaintiffs, unless there are special circumstances.

B. (1) The former owner of the land adjacent to the instant case and the Defendant was aware that the boundary between the instant land and the instant adjacent land was clearly distinguished from the boundary between the two. From December 31, 1976, the former owner H occupied the part corresponding to the inside and outside of the instant land in peace and openly, for twenty (20) years from December 31, 1976, and the acquisition by prescription on this part was completed on December 30, 196.

Therefore, the defendant can exercise the right to claim ownership transfer registration from the former owner H's possession by the former owner H, and the plaintiffs' donation of this case's land from the deceased I.

arrow